Love those curves PreviousNext
Negril.com Message Board > Negril Archives 2007 > Archive through September 08, 2007 >
Thread     Views  Last Post Last Poster Started by Posts
Archive through August 24, 2007 08-24-07  08:47 amLivingLegendsPapamark15
Archive through August 24, 2007 08-24-07  02:47 pmPapamarkPapamark15
Archive through August 24, 2007 08-24-07  04:52 pmReneéReneé15
Archive through August 24, 2007 08-24-07  07:18 pmGarzanLaurel15
Archive through August 24, 2007 08-24-07  09:35 pmdawn kPapamark15
Archive through August 25, 2007 08-25-07  01:11 amdreadneckmnbruce15
Archive through August 25, 2007 08-25-07  02:49 ammnbruceKolya15
Archive through August 25, 2007 08-25-07  09:59 amLaurelKatani 15
Archive through August 25, 2007 08-25-07  06:34 pmToonvox & Bullitkat15
Archive through August 26, 2007 08-26-07  09:39 ammnbruceToonvox & Bullit15
Archive through August 26, 2007 08-26-07  08:34 pmReneéLaurel15
Archive through August 27, 2007 08-27-07  08:07 pmReneétravel2JA15
Archive through August 28, 2007 08-28-07  12:51 ammnbrucemnbruce15
Archive through August 28, 2007 08-28-07  05:44 pmmnbrucedreadneck15
Archive through August 28, 2007 08-28-07  11:44 pmGarzanReneé15
Archive through August 29, 2007 08-29-07  04:17 pmReneémnbruce15
Archive through August 30, 2007 08-30-07  06:24 amJollynutReneé15
Archive through September 04, 2007 09-04-07  06:44 amKatani Jollynut20
 
Message/Author
 mnbruce Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 09:10 am


Post Number: 692
Registered: 11-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Katani,those are some very nice images,good job!


Katani on: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 06:44 am, wrote:

Can you guys recommend a lens for wildlife?




As you stated,the lenses start to get pretty expensive.I don't think I'd be in a rush to start upgrading lenses until you had more time to decide what you really want to focus on in your photography. If I were to suggest a lens for wildlife it would be the Canon 100-400L IS. It's a really nice lens and at $1200-$1400 it's about as cheap as you can get by for nice and sharp images of wildlife. There are more expensive ones but not as versatile as this one.All the images at this link except the two fall color ones were taken with the 100-400. As you see you can use it for other things also but at over 3 lbs it tends to get heavy.

http://images-by-bruce.smugmug.com/gallery/3207066#179833763
 Jim- Donna Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 03:26 pm


Post Number: 760
Registered: 01-2007

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

WOW Bruce!!!! You have some REALLY NICE shots!!! Loved all of them!
I'll Love you till the stars fall out of the sky!
 Garzan Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 04:07 pm
Post Number: 949
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Wow, that is one frickin' huge tree. I wonder if it is a cotton tree? Where is it?
 dreadneck Moderator posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 05:11 pm


Post Number: 937
Registered: 08-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Nice images, Katani and Bruce! The scenery is gorgeous in your location, Katani. I made a mental note to shoot more reflections, yours are beautiful.

Bruce, I figured you were shooting with some sharp glass. My telephoto was relatively inexpensive at $159 and although I'm glad I bought it, I can see how a pro lens, especially with IS, would give me some awesome capabilities. Sticker shock is something to be reckoned with though. The air show is coming up soon at Edwards AFB and your lens would be right at home there.
http://DREADNECK.COM
 Papamark Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 05:39 pm


Post Number: 129
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

Curves lives on...LOL



BioBob...that is an amazing sky you captured over the castle. There is magic and power about that place...

Here are a couple from this June...







 Petrona Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 05:42 pm
Post Number: 317
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

OMG, I totally agrees. What great shots?
 Papamark Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 05:44 pm


Post Number: 130
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

And then it quickly changed to this...





I was relatively sober I thought.
Never seen a sky quite like that evening at BCC!
 dreadneck Moderator posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 05:47 pm


Post Number: 939
Registered: 08-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)


Papamark on: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 05:44 pm, wrote:

I was relatively sober I thought.



No way...then how do you explain seeing that?
http://DREADNECK.COM
 Papamark Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 05:59 pm


Post Number: 132
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

A powerful place mon...only way I can explain it.
 Reneé Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 06:08 pm


Post Number: 1117
Registered: 04-2007

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)

wasn't that the fourth of july, mark? and, so... sober don't include smoke, eh? ;-)

i got lots of wicked sky shots that day and evening! here's a "sky-blue-pink" one that my hubby loves.



Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind. ~Dr. Seuss
 Timm Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 06:29 pm


Post Number: 176
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)


 Timm Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 06:30 pm


Post Number: 177
Registered: 07-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)


 mnbruce Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 06:39 pm


Post Number: 693
Registered: 11-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)


dreadneck on: Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 05:11 pm, wrote:

Bruce, I figured you were shooting with some sharp glass




Dread,that is a very sharp lens,however the vast majority of the shots I post here are with my walk around lens,a 28-105. I just picked the 100-400 up at the end of June and I am thinking of dumping it and picking up a Canon 70-200L 2.8.IS. While the lens is nice for wildlife it is a little slow under low light conditions plus I think the 70-200 fits my long term needs more,which is not wildlife images. It's even more expensive and I can't really justify one lens at that price so 2 is out of the question.
 mnbruce Senior Member posted on Tuesday, September 04, 2007 - 06:40 pm


Post Number: 694
Registered: 11-2006

Rating: N/A
Votes: 0 (Vote!)